DACA – The programme at the heart of the US government shutdown

Protesters at the White House (Photo courtesy of http://www.pbs.org)

We woke up to the news on Saturday of the US government shutdown due to Congress and the White House not being able to reach an agreement on a replacement for the Obama administration’s DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) programme, which has been rescinded by the Trump administration.

Listening to the major news sources, you will come off with the impression that the DACA program simply allowed illegal immigrants to settle in the US with their families in their thousands every year. However, when you scratch beneath the surface, you will find out the The DACA programme actually operated with very strict criteria to protect children of illegal immigrants from deportation to countries they have no practical connection to. The current argument is not whether the programme should continue, as it will not continue, but whether to continue to honour the benefits of the programme to the already eligible population.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) was an American immigration policy that allowed some individuals who entered the country as minors, and had either entered or remained in the country illegally, to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and to be eligible for a work permitWikipedia.

The DACA programme was initiated by the Obama administration in 2012 to find a way of integrating children who were historically brought to the US illegally by their parents and give them a chance at the American dream. America has always been a country who welcomed people from all countries to settle if they are hardworking and law-abiding, even president Trump’s ancestors were immigrants from Germany and his mother was from Scotland who emigrated to the US in the ’30s, and look where he is now!

Today, President Trump believes the programme denies hard-working native Americans a fair chance in the workplace as the immigrants would take up local jobs, housing and other state benefits. He has declared the programme is not going to continue, but gave the congress six months from September 2017 to find a way of dealing with the eligible population in the original programme.

The opponents of DACA argue that it merely gives amnesty to illegal immigrants who would then invite their families in a process known as chain-migration. They believe it encourages illegal immigration. So granting an illegal immigrant a work permit (and eventually permanent residency) will lead to them bringing their extended families to the country. Advocates on the other hand believe that this is a matter of treating children who had no choice in their parent’s decision, humanely. These children (now young adults) have lived in the US for many years and consider themselves American, to suddenly send them back to their countries of origin is not just cruel, but also disadvantageous to the US economy. With the criteria put in place, only law-abiding, hard-working and well-educated migrants will make it through the programme. Why would the US deny itself the benefit of this group of immigrants?

According to an article in the Business Insider looking at the criteria, to be eligible, applicants must have entered the United States before their 16th birthday and prior to June 2007, are currently in school, a high school graduate or have been honourably discharged from the military, be under the age of 31 as of June 15, 2012, and not have a criminal record. These are pretty good safeguards to me that ensures only law-abiding, decent and ambitious immigrants are given the opportunity at the American dream.

So why is President Trump so against the idea? This is because it was one of the main pledges he made during his campaign. His loyal base thrive on him delivering on these promises and this is one of them. No matter how much anyone tries to convince the president otherwise, he holds his voters in a much higher regard than any logical argument.

I believe the programme if well managed is actually good for America, but I know I am in a minority in the current wave of anti-immigrant rhetoric across the world. I believe immigrants are not a nuisance but valuable assets to any country if managed properly. America should know better, as the great country is built on this very principle.